#1 – Only a truly talentless rag would celebrate people outsourcing breakups to a chatbot. Meanwhile their editors can’t even spell “affect” correctly on page three. The “reporting” is screenshot aggregation.
Publisher: East Coast Radio
That title is a clown nose: “The most unhinged ChatGPT requests (You won’t believe #1).” It’s the usual dreck—refund emails, résumé polish, awkward breakups—marketed with carnival-barker nonsense to juice clicks.
The “reporting” is screenshot aggregation. TikTok anecdotes get pasted in as if they’re facts, with zero verification and zero accountability. Calling ChatGPT “our new best friend” is performative fluff, not journalism. The tone reads like someone sobbing into a keyboard, flinging exclamation points to distract from the vacuum.
Only a truly talentless rag would celebrate people outsourcing breakups to a chatbot. Meanwhile their editors can’t even spell “affect” correctly on page three. Honest mistake or lazy sabotage? You decide.
Cheating, fraud, billing clients for ChatGPT spitballing, privacy dumps, armchair therapy—none of it gets legal, ethical, or clinical scrutiny. No educators. No lawyers. No privacy or mental-health experts. Ethics are treated as optional, consequences as an afterthought.
Then the technical faceplants. “0 AI detection.” “ChatGPT did all my legal work.” “Therapy bot fixed me.” These claims need hard disclaimers about hallucinations, detection limits, and domain risk. You don’t hand readers a loaded model and call it a life coach.
It’s padded within an inch of its life. “Also read,” app plugs, “listen live,” random link-chum. If the standards sink any lower they’ll be printing cereal-box fortunes. This is transparent techno-therapy PR, not coverage.
Final score: shelf‑stable listicle trash. Irresponsible where it matters, insulting everywhere else. If clicks replace competence, this is what you get—a glossy shrug at malpractice dressed up as a trend piece.
